Final fantasy 8 portugues ps1 1080p#

In 1999, Final Fantasy 8 ran at an eye-watering (for the wrong reasons) 320Г—240. While a simple resolution boost might not seem like much, it makes a world of difference when comparing the remaster to the original PS1 game.

You get the option to select from FXAA and three different SMAA presets too, but the differences are subtle. On PC, you get a bit more flexibility, with support for arbitrary resolutions. There are no significant differences, so everything we talk about here applies equally to all platforms. This is what the game renders at PS4 Pro and Xbox One X.

Final fantasy 8 portugues ps1 1080p#

On console, youвЂ™re talking about a fixed 1080p resolution. The remaster enhancements make their way across to all platforms. LetвЂ™s take a look at how much has changed and how much has stayed the same since 1999. That is a lot of back-and-forth waffling but you can see that I have complicated feelings about this particular remaster. Would I recommend the remaster as the definitive way to play Final Fantasy VIII? No. ThereвЂ™s a substantial amount of work thatвЂ™s gone into enhancing the artworkвЂ“particularly model quality. But I wouldnвЂ™t term it a simple cash-grab, either. WhatвЂ™s the point of rereleasing a 20 year-old Playstation 1 game on platforms that are three and a half generations ahead? Does the Final Fantasy VIII remaster live up to the high remaster bar that some games these days set? With backwards compatibility on most consoles, PC being backwards compatible almost by definition, why do we even need remasters? ThatвЂ™s not the primary question weвЂ™re addressing in this feature, but itвЂ™s useful to keep it in mind anyways. Is it a new game? Is it just a service to make it more convenient to play certain titles on modern platforms? Is it a way to experience old magic anew? How much has to change for that to happen? Remasters have always been something of a fraught proposition. WeвЂ™re looking at Square EnixвЂ™s Final Fantasy VIII remaster today.